Stranica 1 od 2

Vrisak Edvarda Munka 120 miliona

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 18:17
od Galadriel
Edvard Munch's iconic artwork The Scream sold for $120m


Norwegian expressionist Edvard Munch's The Scream has become the most expensive artwork sold at auction, after it fetched $119.9m (£74m).

The 1895 pastel was bought by an anonymous buyer at Sotheby's in New York. Bidding lasted 12 minutes.

The work is one of four in a series by the Norwegian expressionist artist and was the only one still privately owned.

Proceeds of the sale are to go towards founding a new museum, hotel and art centre in Norway.

Seven bidders were competing for the work, which had a starting price of $40m. The crowd broke into applause, following the sale on Wednesday.



The reason for the record-breaking auction price achieved by The Scream is a simple case of market economics in an age of global capitalism: demand for Grade A art far outstrips supply.

In a world of jittery stock markets and double-dip recessions, top-end artworks have become a reliable and highly desirable investment for the world's super-rich.

There are five factors at play in dictating an artwork's value: rarity, reputation of the artist, confidence in the market, condition of the artwork, and competition for the piece.

It is this last factor that has powered the continued rise in prices. A few years ago Sotheby's would have had bidders from three or four countries, now it's 20 or 30: that's globalisation for you.

The sale price includes the buyer's premium.

The previous record for an artwork sold at auction was for Picasso's Nude, Green Leaves, and Bust, which sold for $106.5m in 2010.

According to Forbes, The Scream is the eighth most expensive painting sold at a private or public auction, when prices are adjusted for inflation.

'Trembling with anxiety'
The other three versions of The Scream are all owned by Norwegian museums, but Sotheby's say the version they sold is the most colourful.

It is also the only one to include a poem by Munch on the frame, which talks of the inspiration behind the series of works.

It reads: "I was walking along a path with two friends - the sun was setting - suddenly the sky turned blood red - I paused, feeling exhausted, and leaned on the fence - there was blood and tongues of fire above the blue-black fjord and the city.

"My friends walked on, and I stood there trembling with anxiety - and I sensed an infinite scream passing through nature."

The piece was sold by businessman Petter Olsen, whose father was friendly with the Norwegian artist.

Earlier this year, Mr Olsen said he had decided to sell The Scream because he wanted to "offer the rest of the world a chance to own and appreciate this remarkable work".


$100M ARTWORKS

Edvard Munch, The Scream - $119.9m (2012)
Picasso, Nude, Green Leaves, and Bust - $106.5m (2010)
Alberto Giacometti, Walking Man I - $104.3m (2010)
Picasso, Boy With a Pipe - $104.1m (2004)
After the sale, he said: "I hope that the publicity given by this sale will increase public interest in Munch's work and awareness of the important message that I feel it conveys.

"The Scream, for me, shows the horrifying moment when man realises his impact on nature and the irreversible changes that he has initiated."

Sotheby's auctioneer Tobias Meyer said the painting was "worth every penny".

"It is one of the great icons of art in the world and whoever bought it should be congratulated," he said.

"This evening's sale was a dream for an auctioneer and to be able to sell The Scream for over $100 million was a moment that I cherish as an auctioneer."

The painting has become one of the famous works of art in popular culture.


Philip Hook from Sotheby's discusses Edvard Munch's masterpiece with the BBC's David Sillito
"Together with the Mona Lisa, it's the most famous and recognised image in art history," Michael Frahm, an art adviser with Frahm Ltd, told the Associated Press news agency.

He added that it has been "used by everyone from Warhol to Hollywood to cartoons to teacups and T-shirts".

Two of the other versions of The Scream were stolen, in 1994 and 2004 respectively. Both were later recovered.



izvor:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-17926519

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 18:32
od KorvinOdAmbera
Slika

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 18:51
od Galadriel
na norveškim vestima je bilo da je kupio neki šeik

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 21:02
od deran
ja likovnu umetnost ič ne razumem....

Slika

msm... :drama:

Re: Vrisak Edvarda Munka 120 miliona

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 22:57
od Ulix
Kada bih imao (hipotetički govoreći) 120 miliona evra viška, radije bih sebi kupio nekog Modiljanija ili de Kuninga. :kosa:

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:21
od Azdaja
nikad ne bi dala tolike pare na sliku, nikad...ili bi dala u dobrotvorne ili kupila neko usamljeno ostrvo, opet...:D

Re: Vrisak Edvarda Munka 120 miliona

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:28
od Galadriel
[url=http://gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379426#p2379426]Ulix napisao:[/url]Kada bih imao (hipotetički govoreći) 120 miliona evra viška, radije bih sebi kupio nekog Modiljanija ili de Kuninga. :kosa:

Kad su ovako velike sume novca u pitanju, vise nije do umetnosti vec je investicija. Nece joj opasti vrednost svakako.

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:29
od Azdaja
jesi li ulozila neke velike pare u sliku? :)

Re:

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:32
od Ulix
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379435#p2379435]Azdaja napisao:[/url]nikad ne bi dala tolike pare na sliku, nikad..
Mislim da meni ne bi bio problem. Moj odnos prema novcu je vrlo fluidan. Sad ga imam sad ga nemam, iako je uglavnom ovo drugo slučaj. :lol:
Ali ako nešto želim i to mogu sebi da priuštim, obično mi nije žao da dam pare.

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:35
od Galadriel
2 azdaja ne, ja sam moje slike dobila na poklon od drugarice autorke

Re: Re:

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:36
od Azdaja
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379442#p2379442]Ulix napisao:[/url]
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379435#p2379435]Azdaja napisao:[/url]nikad ne bi dala tolike pare na sliku, nikad..
Mislim da meni ne bi bio problem. Moj odnos prema novcu je vrlo fluidan. Sad ga imam sad ga nemam, iako je uglavnom ovo drugo slučaj. :lol:
Ali ako nešto želim i to mogu sebi da priuštim, obično mi nije žao da dam pare.


razumem...ali, ja vise volim kupiti kuce, stanove, plazu, automobile, nego sliku - nikad od mene umetnicka dusa(a jesam martial artist :lol: )...ali, toliko pare dati za sliku...hmmm ne bi :)

Re:

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:38
od Azdaja
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379445#p2379445]Galadriel napisao:[/url]2 azdaja ne, ja sam moje slike dobila na poklon od drugarice autorke


lepo...i ja volim slike koje poseduju moji roditelji, al nikad ne bi platila ni upola za ta umetnicka dela...:)))

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:39
od Galadriel
to je biznis kao i svaki drugi. nije kupio "samo" sliku. slika je naftna bushotina

Re:

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:41
od Ulix
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379450#p2379450]Galadriel napisao:[/url]to je biznis kao i svaki drugi. nije kupio "samo" sliku
A možda i nije.

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:45
od Galadriel
ne kazem da kupac ne zna da vrednuje ili ne vrednuje umetnost. ali please, da nije investicija onda bi za 120 miliona mogao na 120 miliona drugih nachina da zadovolji svoje katarzicne porive i da sI nadje fine-looking reprodukciju

Re:

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:50
od Ulix
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379453#p2379453]Galadriel napisao:[/url]ne kazem da kupac ne zna da vrednuje ili ne vrednuje umetnost. ali please, da nije investicija onda bi za 120 miliona mogao na 120 miliona drugih nachina da zadovolji svoje katarzicne porive i da si nadje fine looking reprodukciju
Najverovatnije ti jesi u pravu, ali ja mogu da zamislim da dam toliko para bez ikakve ideje da je to investicija, samo zato što mi je nešto lepo.

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:52
od Galadriel
me too :D zato ih nikad necu ni imati da investiram :D :D

Poslato: 10 Maj 2012, 23:54
od Ulix
:lol:

Istina.

Re:

Poslato: 11 Maj 2012, 00:09
od Blady
[url=http://gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379435#p2379435]Azdaja napisao:[/url]nikad ne bi dala tolike pare na sliku, nikad...ili bi dala u dobrotvorne ili kupila neko usamljeno ostrvo, opet...:D
:up:

Dala bih dosta para, ali ne toliko. Mene na neki nacin ubija u pojam cinjenica kako ljudi jadno zive, i onda kao da dam toliko miliona na jebenu sliku.

Poslato: 11 Maj 2012, 00:20
od Galadriel
jeez, otvorite temu o ratnoj industriji, korporacijama

ovaj novac velicha univerzalnost umetnickog dozivljaja i covecanska je zaostavstina, kao piramide npr. hvala bogu na ovim ciframa!

Re:

Poslato: 11 Maj 2012, 00:40
od deran
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379470#p2379470]Galadriel napisao:[/url]

ovaj novac velicha univerzalnost umetnickog dozivljaja i covecanska je zaostavstina, kao piramide npr. hvala bogu na ovim ciframa!

šta si ti sad htela reći,majke ti...

(i pošto su piramide...?)

Poslato: 11 Maj 2012, 00:43
od Blady
^ Ma ne seri.
Btw odnosi se na Galadriel.
Edit - Novac ne velica umetnost, nikada nije, niti ce.
To moze samo da kaze neko ko je materijalista.

Poslato: 11 Maj 2012, 00:48
od bas bleu
u ja bih jedno 30 deka piramide. cenim da imam za toliko.

Re:

Poslato: 11 Maj 2012, 00:53
od Galadriel
[url=http://gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379474#p2379474]Blady napisao:[/url]^ Ma ne seri.

To moze samo da kaze neko ko je materijalista.
take a look around. nisam ja uredjivala svet.

a sto se tice 30 deka piramide :D

koliko novca ode u budzet egipta godisnje od turizma?

Tourism is one of the most important sectors in Egypt's economy. More than 12.8 million tourists visited Egypt in 2008, providing revenues of nearly $11 billion. The sector employs about 12 percent of Egypt's workforce.

Poslato: 11 Maj 2012, 00:55
od Blady
^ Da, ali je po tebi to merilo.
Po meni nije :)

Re: Re:

Poslato: 11 Maj 2012, 00:57
od Galadriel
[url=http://gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379473#p2379473]deran napisao:[/url]
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379470#p2379470]Galadriel napisao:[/url]


htela sam reci to sto sam napisala da su piramide covecanska zaostavstina,
ovaj novac velicha univerzalnost umetnickog dozivljaja i covecanska je zaostavstina, kao piramide npr. hvala bogu na ovim ciframa!

šta si ti sad htela reći,majke ti...

(i pošto su piramide...?)
htela sam reci da su piramide covecanska zaostavstina kao i bilo kakvo umetnicko stvaralastvo, arhitektonsko, sta god, bilo sta sto je covek ostavio iza sebe i svojim delom nastavio da zivi posle smrti

Re:

Poslato: 11 Maj 2012, 01:00
od Galadriel
[url=http://gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2379482#p2379482]Blady napisao:[/url]^ Da, ali je po tebi to merilo.
Po meni nije :)
merilo cega? cene kostanja? da


imam omiljene slike i slikare i nemaju veze sa njihovim fluktuacijama trzisnih cena

covek, as in bilo koji na svetu, da bi uzivao u originalnom umetnickom delu mora da se odrekne materijalnih 120 miliona za genuine munka

o cemu ti? :D

Poslato: 11 Maj 2012, 01:04
od Blady
^ Upravo o tome.
Da tih 120 miliona nije merilo jedne slike, i da bi neko uzivao u njoj.
Nazalost, pa su ljudi uskraceni bas zbog takvih idiota.

Poslato: 11 Maj 2012, 01:09
od Galadriel
ne moram to da argumentujem, jer te realnost opovrgava.

novac je samo univerzalno sredstvo razmene. ne govori ti koliko vredis, tako da nema razloga imati nesto protiv novca :neznam:

nije on uspeo da sa 120 miliona unisti sve stampane i preslikavane tragove vriska i ne cuva je samo za svoje uzivanje. naprotiv sa 120 miliona je popularizovao, sada je za nju cuo i ko nije znao

njemu odgovara da je sto cuvenija jer dobija na vrednosti

Poslato: 11 Maj 2012, 01:15
od Blady
Nema ovde nikakve veze realnost.
Ovo je licni dozivljaj necega, gde ti nisi merodavna da komentarises da li je realno.
Kao sto rekoh, merila su nam razlicita.

Edit = Apsolutno nemam nista protiv novca.
Cini mi se da si malopre pisala 'ovaj novac velicha univerzalnost umetnickog dozivljaja'

pa onda 'novac je samo univerzalno sredstvo razmene'

Razmene, razmene cega?
Dozivljaja?
Ne razumem.